Close Menu

    Closings

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter)
    News Radio KMAN
    • Local/State News
      • Manhattan
      • Wamego
      • Riley County
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Fort Riley
      • Geary County
      • State News
      • RCPD Reports
    • Weather
    • Sports
      • K-State Sports
      • High School Sports
        • HS Basketball Schedule & Scores
          • Manhattan High
          • Wamego
          • Rock Creek
          • Riley County
          • Frankfort
          • Blue Valley High
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • Podcasts
      • Within Reason with Mike Matson
      • The Game
      • Wildcat Insider
      • Scoreboard Saturday
    • Obituaries
    • Message Us
      • Birthday/Anniversary
    • Keep It Local
    Listen
    Closings And Delaystyle=
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Local News»Geary County»Kansas Supreme Court Rules

    Kansas Supreme Court Rules

    0
    By KMAN Staff on December 6, 2013 Geary County, Local News, Manhattan, Riley County, Top Story
    Kansas Judicial Center, Topeka
    Kansas Judicial Center, Topeka

    A couple of area court cases have been ruled on at the Kansas Supreme Court level, with the high court agreeing with the lower court in both cases.

    One in Riley County deals with Iron Mound LLC versus Nueterra Healthcare Management and Successor-in-Interest of ASC Group, LLC. The case deals with a contract involving the two parties, and Manhattan Surgical Center.

    After Iron Mound dissolved its company, it continued to receive a percentage of management fees from Manhattan Surgical. But a second negotiated management agreement took effect,with the original managment agreement expiring, leading to discontinuation of payments to Iron Mound. 

    Iron Mound sued for breach of contract, but Riley County District court and Judge Meryl Wilson denied the summary judgement to Iron Mound. The court of appeals had reversed the district court rulling, but the Supreme Court reversed that decision, in effect affirming the original district court decision  against Iron Mound.

    The other case comes from Geary County involving Stanton Holt, who asked for a new trial after a conviction in 1994 of more than 60 offenses, including two counts of first degree murder in Junction City.

    The high court indicated Holt was well beyond the time limit prescribed in Kansas law and states it does not consider Holt’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel because it was rasied for the first time on appeal.

    The Kansas Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s summary dismissal of the motion for a new trial, which was filed 16 years after Holt’s convictions.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    KMAN Staff
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)

    Related Posts

    Manhattan High implementing zero-tolerance policy for cell phones

    City to receive updates on housing projects, street maintenance and cemetery improvements

    Manhattan residents face meth charges; bond set at $60k and $27k

    Listen Live Here
    Listen Live - Mobile

    Categories

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    x