Close Menu

    Closings

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter)
    News Radio KMAN
    • Local/State News
      • Manhattan
      • Wamego
      • Riley County
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Fort Riley
      • Geary County
      • State News
      • RCPD Reports
    • Weather
    • Sports
      • K-State Sports
      • High School Sports
        • HS Basketball Schedule & Scores
          • Manhattan High
          • Wamego
          • Rock Creek
          • Riley County
          • Frankfort
          • Blue Valley High
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • Podcasts
      • Within Reason with Mike Matson
      • The Game
      • Wildcat Insider
      • Scoreboard Saturday
    • Obituaries
    • Message Us
      • Birthday/Anniversary
    • Keep It Local
    Listen
    Closings And Delaystyle=
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Local News»Court of Appeals Rules on Area Cases

    Court of Appeals Rules on Area Cases

    0
    By KMAN Staff on March 15, 2014 Local News, Pottawatomie County, Riley County, State News, Top Story

    Gavel-150x150 (1)

    The Kansas Court of Appeals has ruled on a Pottawatomie County court case, with an opinion released Friday. The case involves a property dispute between a father and daughter. The appeals court reversed and remanded the case for further proceedings in Ellen Byers Bouton v. Walter Byers.

    The 31 page opinion is based on appeal from Pottawatomie District Court, with Judge Jeffrey Elder presiding. The case revolves around a disputed million-dollar promise between Father and daughter, with Ellen Byers Bouton appealing on grounds the local court precipitately entered summary judgment, improperly cutting short her action for equitable relief on the broken promise. The court of appeals agree.

    The opinion looks at Bouton overseeing civil litigation against her brother to recoup losses in the ranch and cattle business with her father, with Bouton even leaving a position as a tenure-track law professor at Washburn University  to move to the family ranch in the spring of 2005. A dispute regarding getting water to animals after the water system on the ranch froze in December of 2008 led to the father telling his daughter her services were no longer needed.

    Since that time Bouton returned to Washburn in a part-time teaching position without possibility of tenure, and Byers contracted to sell the ranch. Bouton filed the suit against Byers in December of 2011 based on what she would have earned if she had not given up her Washburn position.

    The court’s conclusion is a that  factfinder could conclude Bouton reasonably relied on Byers’ March 2005 promise. And with the disputed facts and credibility determinations, a trial is required, according to the higher court.

    ###

    A Riley County court case involving the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection act was affirmed by the Kansas Court of Appeals, with an opinion made public Friday. Veronia Fox v. Edward Fox involved a divorce which was filed in a foreign country when the parties had never lived in or owned property in Kansas. Edward was a serviceman for the Army and Veronia was a German citizen.

    The divorce was granted in Germany in October of 2009, with Edward Fox  not even moving to Fort Riley for a Civil Service position until 2011.

    The appeals court declined to extend the meaning of the protection act to include a divorce filed in a foreign country between two parties who never lived in or owned property in Kansas. And the higher court found the district court’s dismissal of this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was proper. Judge John Bosch presided locally.

     

     

    A Riley County court case involving the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection act was affirmed by the Kansas Court of Appeals, with an opinion made public Friday. Veronia Fox v. Edward Fox involved a divorce which was filed in a foreign country when the parties had never lived in or owned property in Kansas. Edward was a serviceman for the Army and Veronia was a German citizen.

     

    The divorce was granted in Germany in October of 2009, with Edward Fox  not even moving to Fort Riley for a Civil Service position until 2011.

     

    The appeals court declined to extend the meaning of the protection act to include a divorce filed in a foreign country between two parties who never lived in or owned property in Kansas. And the higher court found the district court’s dismissal of this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was proper. Judge John Bosch presided locally.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    KMAN Staff
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)

    Related Posts

    City commission rejects Morse nomination to planning board

    Manhattan teen involved in serious crash on US 77

    Manhattan woman arrested after firing gun in road rage incident

    Listen Live Here
    Listen Live - Mobile

    Categories

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    x