Close Menu

    Closings

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter)
    News Radio KMAN
    • Local/State News
      • Manhattan
      • Wamego
      • Riley County
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Fort Riley
      • Geary County
      • State News
      • RCPD Reports
    • Weather
    • Sports
      • K-State Sports
      • High School Sports
        • HS Basketball Schedule & Scores
          • Manhattan High
          • Wamego
          • Rock Creek
          • Riley County
          • Frankfort
          • Blue Valley High
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • Podcasts
      • Within Reason with Mike Matson
      • The Game
      • Wildcat Insider
      • Scoreboard Saturday
    • Obituaries
    • Message Us
      • Birthday/Anniversary
    • Keep It Local
    Listen
    Closings And Delaystyle=
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Local News»Riley County»Commissioners Disagree on Evaluation Process

    Commissioners Disagree on Evaluation Process

    0
    By KMAN Staff on March 26, 2015 Riley County

    riley county commissionA 2015 department head evaluation process discussion, scheduled for Thursday’s Riley County Commission meeting, turned into a debate after Commission Chair, Ron Wells and Commissioner, Robert Boyd shared differing opinions.

    Human Resource Manager, Cindy Volanti presented on the topic.  She mentioned the board had approved last year to hold the department head evaluations three times every year.  This was approved as a trial at that time and Volanti returned to the commission to ask if they would like to continue with this process.

    Wells commented he did not feel it had any positive, nor negative, impact on the county.  He mentioned he spoke with a previous county commissioner, who also felt there was no need for the increased number of evaluations.  “We’re eating up some of their [department heads]time and right now, I’d rather they spend their time helping us on this budget”.

    Boyd said he disagreed with Wells’s opinion.  “I think it’s part of leadership to review with staff that you supervise.  You do it on a reoccurring basis.  I don’t find the April, August, and December schedule to be too much”.  Boyd mentioned he believes the process allows them to be more efficient, by speaking to department heads more frequently so they can be on top of things that are going on within their departments.

    Wells argued the current evaluation schedule was “micro-managing” the department heads and that it should return to just an annual process.  “You know I’m not a micro-manager Ron.  You’re just being lazy not wanting to be involved”, Boyd stated.

    Besides arguing over the efficiency of the evaluation process, Wells mentioned if a problem occurred within a department-that specific department head could still be brought in on a case-by-case basis if necessary.  Boyd quickly asked, “You think I don’t know that Ron?”

    A compromise was suggested by Commissioner, Ben Wilson.  He asked Wells and Boyd if they’d be comfortable with a semi-annual evaluation schedule.

    Ultimately this suggestion was approved on a unanimous vote.  The first evaluation will be held sometime in July.  The last evaluation will take place at the end of the year, sometime in mid-December.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    KMAN Staff
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)

    Related Posts

    Riley County proposes budget with 17% tax hike for average homeowner

    Authorities arrest 28 in connection to year-long area drug distribution investigation

    Riley County receives an update on opioid funds

    Listen Live Here
    Listen Live - Mobile

    Categories

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.