Close Menu

    Closings

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter)
    News Radio KMAN
    • Local/State News
      • Manhattan
      • Wamego
      • Riley County
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Fort Riley
      • Geary County
      • State News
      • RCPD Reports
    • Weather
    • Sports
      • K-State Sports
      • High School Sports
        • HS Basketball Schedule & Scores
          • Manhattan High
          • Wamego
          • Rock Creek
          • Riley County
          • Frankfort
          • Blue Valley High
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • Podcasts
      • Within Reason with Mike Matson
      • The Game
      • Wildcat Insider
      • Scoreboard Saturday
    • Obituaries
    • Message Us
      • Birthday/Anniversary
    • Keep It Local
    Listen
    Closings And Delaystyle=
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Local News»Kansas Court of Appeals affirms Riley County Barrett conviction

    Kansas Court of Appeals affirms Riley County Barrett conviction

    0
    By KMAN Staff on August 16, 2016 Local News, Riley County
    Howard Barrett, photo courtesy of KDOC
    Howard Barrett, photo courtesy of KDOC
    Howard Barrett, photo courtesy of KDOC
    The Kansas Court of Appeals has affirmed a ruling in State v Barrett–a second degree murder case in Riley County District Court a couple of years ago. The Howard Barrett case has actually gotten recognition state-wide for mental health implications, with Barrett, 57, found guilty in November of 2014 of the reckless fatal stabbing of Thomas James, 48, of Clay Center in February of 2008. Barrett was sentenced to 123 months or more than 10 years, with the secretary of corrections.
    The appeal for Barrett maintained the 6-year delay in bringing him to trial violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial; that the district court committed error in failing to suppress incriminating statements made after Miranda warnings were read to him; and that the district court committed error in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of imperfect self-defense voluntary manslaughter.
    However the state court of appeals indicated “Finding no reversible error, we affirm Barrett’s conviction.”
    The 30 page document recounts several aspects of the case. One judge, Karen ARNOLD-BURGER,  dissented from her colleagues, saying she was unable to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the failure to give Howard Barrett’s requested instruction on the offense of voluntary manslaughter-imperfect self-defense was harmless error.
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    KMAN Staff
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)

    Related Posts

    City to receive updates on housing projects, street maintenance and cemetery improvements

    Manhattan residents face meth charges; bond set at $60k and $27k

    Flint Hills Breadbasket moves in to new, expanded location

    Listen Live Here
    Listen Live - Mobile

    Categories

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    x