Close Menu

    Closings

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter)
    News Radio KMAN
    • Local/State News
      • Manhattan
      • Wamego
      • Riley County
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Fort Riley
      • Geary County
      • State News
      • RCPD Reports
    • Weather
    • Sports
      • K-State Sports
      • High School Sports
        • HS Basketball Schedule & Scores
          • Manhattan High
          • Wamego
          • Rock Creek
          • Riley County
          • Frankfort
          • Blue Valley High
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • Podcasts
      • Within Reason with Mike Matson
      • The Game
      • Wildcat Insider
      • Scoreboard Saturday
    • Obituaries
    • Message Us
      • Birthday/Anniversary
    • Keep It Local
    Listen
    Closings And Delaystyle=
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Local News»Pott County commission opposes historical listing for courthouse

    Pott County commission opposes historical listing for courthouse

    0
    By KMAN Staff on November 16, 2017 Local News, Pottawatomie County
    Pottawatomie County District Courthouse (Photo courtesy Google Maps)
    Pottawatomie County District Courthouse (Photo courtesy Google Maps)

    The Pottawatomie County Commission voted 3-0 Monday that it is opposed to the possible listing of the Pottawatomie County Courthouse on the National Register of Historic Places.

    Properties with such a listing are eligible to qualify for state tax credits and the Heritage Trust Fund grant program.
    Consideration of the courthouse’s nomination to the National Register will be held at 9 a.m. Saturday in the Kansas Museum of Natural History by the Kansas Historic Sites Board of Review.
    Pottawatomie County commissioners, from left, Pat Weixelman, Travis Altenhofen and Dee McKee. (Staff photo by Eric Scheidt)

    The debate over the preservation of the building began in July, after a study concluded that replacing the structure with a new consolidated office building would serve as the most cost-effective way of meeting the county’s long-range facility storage needs.

    At that time, County Public Works Director Peter Clark spoke with KMAN and said Clint Hibbs of BG Consultants shared a completed financial study on the options of razing the courthouse verse restoration. The study says restoring the courthouse to modern code and standards would cost the county $3.6 million over 20 years.

    A new building, however, would cost $2.6 million over the same span — including destruction of the current courthouse.

    Still, Clark said many citizens want to see the existing courthouse stay after county officials hosted a tour of it in the summer.

    “There appears to be a large sentiment, from at least the 100 people who were there, that they would like to see the courthouse remain,” Clark said in July. “There has not been identified a funding source hasn’t been identified to assist us with preserving the courthouse, or conserving it in its current condition. I think that would go a long ways in helping making a decision one way or the other.”

    Clark said space is an issue and that future growth — Pottawatomie County already being the fastest-growing county in the state — puts even more pressure on the issue.

    Some citizens said they wanted to put the decision up to a vote, Clark said, but added a vote might not be binding to whatever direction the county commission goes.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    KMAN Staff
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)

    Related Posts

    Caterpillar workers to remain in Wamego

    City commission advances ordinance to establish incentive district for workforce housing

    Amazon expanding to Manhattan after securing purchase agreement

    Listen Live Here
    Listen Live - Mobile

    Categories

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    x