Close Menu

    Closings

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter)
    News Radio KMAN
    • Local/State News
      • Manhattan
      • Wamego
      • Riley County
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Fort Riley
      • Geary County
      • State News
      • RCPD Reports
    • Weather
    • Sports
      • K-State Sports
      • High School Sports
        • HS Basketball Schedule & Scores
          • Manhattan High
          • Wamego
          • Rock Creek
          • Riley County
          • Frankfort
          • Blue Valley High
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • Podcasts
      • Within Reason with Mike Matson
      • The Game
      • Wildcat Insider
      • Scoreboard Saturday
    • Obituaries
    • Message Us
      • Birthday/Anniversary
    • Keep It Local
    Listen
    Closings And Delaystyle=
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Local News»Kansas Supreme Court reverses Riley County man’s aggravated criminal sodomy convictions; case remanded to district court

    Kansas Supreme Court reverses Riley County man’s aggravated criminal sodomy convictions; case remanded to district court

    0
    By Brandon Peoples on September 11, 2020 Local News, Riley County
    Ziad Khalil-Alsalaami (Kansas Dept. of Corrections photo)
    Ziad Khalil-Alsalaami (Kansas Dept. of Corrections photo)

    The Kansas Supreme Court has reversed two aggravated criminal sodomy convictions for a Riley County man.

    Ziad Khalil-Alsalaami was previously convicted of the two counts involving a 13-year-old girl at a house party in 2010. The Supreme Court said in its decision Friday the convictions must be reversed because his trial counsel was ineffective and therefore violated his rights under the Sixth Amendment, which ensures a right to a speedy trial.

    Khalil-Alsaalami argued his trial attorneys were ineffective because they stipulated that a confession he made during police interrogation was voluntary. At a hearing later on his ineffective assistance claims, Khalil-Alsalaami’s counsel acknowledged 3 of the 5 voluntariness factors weighed in favor of suppression. The counsel contended they didn’t challenge the admissibility as a matter of trial strategy.

    The Supreme Court held such a strategy constituted ineffective assistance and may have been enough that Khalil-Alsalaami may have been acquitted. The case has been remanded to Riley County District Court.

    The full ruling can be found here.

    Oral arguments from the case are below.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Brandon Peoples
    • Website

    KMAN News Director and host of In Focus. Contact Brandon at Brandon@1350KMAN.com

    Related Posts

    RCPD officer arrested on charges of unlawful computer acts, placed on leave

    Chandler to serve two lifetime terms after Westmoreland sentencing

    City officials approve agreement for streetscape improvements for Hartford project

    Listen Live Here
    Listen Live - Mobile

    Categories

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.