Close Menu

    Closings

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter)
    News Radio KMAN
    • Local/State News
      • Manhattan
      • Wamego
      • Riley County
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Fort Riley
      • Geary County
      • State News
      • RCPD Reports
    • Weather
    • Sports
      • K-State Sports
      • High School Sports
        • HS Basketball Schedule & Scores
          • Manhattan High
          • Wamego
          • Rock Creek
          • Riley County
          • Frankfort
          • Blue Valley High
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • Podcasts
      • Within Reason with Mike Matson
      • The Game
      • Wildcat Insider
      • Scoreboard Saturday
    • Obituaries
    • Message Us
      • Birthday/Anniversary
    • Keep It Local
    Listen
    Closings And Delaystyle=
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Sports»Big 12 Sports»Finals Week: Linebackers & Defensive Backs

    Finals Week: Linebackers & Defensive Backs

    0
    By EMAW Online on December 15, 2022 Big 12 Sports, K-State Football, Sports

    by Mason Voth • EMAWOnline – Managing Editor – @TheRealMasonV

    As K-State finishes up the fall semester this week with its finals, it seemed like a good time to dish out final grades for K-State’s season. Each day this week I will give my final evaluations for each group and also take a look at how PFF graded them for the season.

    Monday: Quarterback
    Tuesday: Running Back/Wide Receiver
    Wednesday: Defensive Line/Offensive Line
    Thursday: Defensive Backs/Linebackers
    Friday: Special Teams

    LINEBACKERS: B+

    Daniel Green’s ability had started to shine with each year that went on for the Chris Klieman Era at K-State and he continued that upward trajectory this season. Green impressed me all year with his ability to make timely plays and having an awareness of where to be to make plays that improved the win probability for K-State.

    The story of the linebacking corps this season was Austin Moore though, who had seen under 200 snaps in his first two seasons as a Wildcat on the defensive side of the ball. This season, Moore played the most snaps of any K-State linebacker, earned the nickname “The Machine” and seemingly was everywhere the ball was.

    Khalid Duke made his triumphant return to the K-State defense after missing a majority of the 2021 season with an injury, and he made his worth known early, having a three-sack game against Texas Tech.

    The Wildcats were able to work in young faces like Desmond Purnell and Jake Clifton this season, who gained invaluable experience heading toward 2023.

    I think the K-State linebackers were what you want out of a group in the middle of your defense — solid. Even though I thought this group was really strong, nothing warrants a higher grade in my opinion.

    PFF Grades

    K-State Linebacker PFF Grades
    Player Overall Defense Run Defense Tackling Pass Rush Snap % of 938
    Austin Moore 70.9 70.6 72.2 59.7 84%
    Daniel Green 66.3 63.3 68.2 67.6 63%
    Khalid Duke 68.0 68.5 85.8 76.9 60%
    Des Purnell 58.4 67.4 47.2 56.6 30%
    Nick Allen 59.8 59.3 73.1 57.2 30%
    Jake Clifton 58.2 56.1 56.0 64.5 9%
    Gavin Forsha 62.1 55.3 41.0 59.7 8%
    Beau Palmer 68.7 66.8 57.7 57.4 4%

    SECONDARY: A-

    Is this grade a little higher than it should be? Possibly. But consider where we thought the Wildcats would be in 2022 in the secondary, completely lost and looking for help at safety. By the end of the season, K-State had more than enough options to step up and patrol the backend of the defense. It also helped to have two talented corners on the edges with Julius Brents and Ekow Boye-Doe.

    Brents earned All-Big 12 First Team this season and will have an upcoming NFL career, a lot of which is deserved for shutting down receivers this season. Something that was absent at times in 2021, due to what mostly seemed like bad luck for Brents. His partner, Boye-Doe, had strong moments this season, like his shutdown game against Oklahoma State and giving his arm to stop TCU. Just as much as a pass rush can help create interceptions, a talented unit in coverage can help create sacks. Two things that the Wildcats were among the best in the Big 12 at creating this season.

    As I mentioned above, the safeties for K-State were a concern entering the season. No one had a good grasp of what to expect from that spot and gave some worry about what might happen against the high-flying Big 12 offenses. Quickly, those questions went away. Transfers Josh Hayes and Kobe Savage quickly made a name for themselves by hitting hard and similarly to Green and more at linebacker, just finding a way to be involved in seemingly every play.

    Drake Cheatum was also very versatile for the K-State defense and became the second straight Prairie View A&M transfer to pay big dividends for Joe Klanderman’s unit. The surprises and overachieving of the secondary helps me boost their grade. Maybe that is fair, maybe it isn’t, but the success of the corners and safeties is one of the main reasons K-State can call themselves Big 12 Champions.

    PFF Grades

    K-State Secondary PFF Grades
    Player Overall Defense Run Defense Tackling Coverage Snap % of 938
    Josh Hayes 66.0 54.2 50.8 69.5 82%
    Ekow Boye-Doe 64.1 67.4 64.4 65.1 78%
    Julius Brents 75.3 81.4 76.8 75.9 77%
    Drake Cheatum 67.9 73.5 76.3 62.0 67%
    Kobe Savage 52.3 45.0 53.9 54.8 55%
    Cincere Mason 74.5 43.5 51.5 88.4 33%
    VJ Payne 66.6 53.5 61.4 70.2 32%
    Jacob Parrish 70.0 64.6 86.9 70.7 31%
    TJ Smith 55.9 52.7 69.1 57.0 21%
    Omar Daniels 64.7 70.0 47.0 63.4 12%
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    EMAW Online
    • Website

    Related Posts

    SEC amps up fines to $500,000 for rushing field, storming court

    2025 State Track and Field Results: Day One

    Big 12 men’s basketball decision to drop to 18 conference games goes beyond injury prevention

    Listen Live Here
    Listen Live - Mobile

    Categories

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2024 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.