Close Menu

    Closings

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Login
    TOP STORIES
    • Kansas state officials begin process of interpreting ‘poorly drafted’ bathroom law
    • RCPD Report: 2/22/26
    • Lubbock lows linger in blowout loss at No. 13 Texas Tech
    • RCPD Report: 2/21/26
    • Marchand arrested on new drug charges, just three days after being released from jail
    • Junction City spoils Manhattan boys’ senior night
    • Manhattan girls snap skid in senior night win over Junction City
    • The Game – 2/20/26
    News Radio KMAN
    • News
      • Manhattan
      • Riley County
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Geary County
      • Fort Riley
      • RCPD Reports
      • Wamego
      • State News
    • Sports
      • High School Sports
        • HS Football Schedule & Scores
          • Centennial League
          • NCKL
          • Big East League
          • Flint Hills League
          • Twin Valley League
      • K-State Sports
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • Podcasts
      • Within Reason with Mike Matson
      • The Game
      • Wildcat Insider
      • Scoreboard Saturday
    • Weather
    • Obituaries
    • Birthdays/Anniversaries
    • Keep It Local
      • KMAN Broadcast Calendar
      • The Manhattan Mercury
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Listen
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    News Radio KMAN
    News Radio KMAN
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Local News»Kansas Supreme Court hears arguments in Prairiewood v. Riley County Commission

    Kansas Supreme Court hears arguments in Prairiewood v. Riley County Commission

    0
    By Brandon Peoples on January 31, 2026 Local News, Riley County

    The Kansas Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in a long-running dispute over an amended planned unit development application by the Riley County Commission, which Prairiewood Holdings LLC has appealed.

    The dispute centers on whether a protest petition from neighboring landowners has met the legal threshold under state law. The county board initially ruled the protest petition did not apply because the project was only a PUD and not a rezoning.

    The Court of Appeals disagreed, holding that because the amendment increased building square footage by more than 1% county regulations required the same process as a rezoning, including allowing protest petitions.

    To view the full article visit theMercury.com.

    Click here for more local Manhattan news.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Brandon Peoples
    • Website

    KMAN Program Director and The Mercury news reporter. Contact Brandon at Brandon@1350kman.com

    Related Posts

    Marchand arrested on new drug charges, just three days after being released from jail

    Police pursuit ends in suspect’s death in Junction City

    Marlow found guilty on one of four child sex crimes charges

    LISTEN LIVE HERE
    LISTEN LIVE - MOBILE

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2026 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2026 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.