Facebook Twitter Instagram
    • Personalities/Staff
    • Jobs
    • Calendar
    • Keeping it Local
    • Contest Rules
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    RSS Facebook Twitter
    News Radio KMAN
    ESB's Managing Your Money
    • Local/State News
      • Manhattan
      • Riley County
      • Wamego
      • Pottawatomie County
      • Fort Riley
      • Geary County
      • State News
      • RCPD Reports
    • Weather
    • Sports
      • High School Sports
        • Scores
      • Scoreboard Saturday
      • K-State Sports
      • Student-Athlete of the Week
    • On Demand
      • In Focus
      • Who’s On In Focus
      • The Game
      • Managing Your Money by ESB Financial
      • Wildcat Insider
    • Obituaries
    • Message Us
      • Birthday/Anniversary
    Listen
    News Radio KMAN
    You are at:Home»Local News»Ruling on motions in second degree murder case

    Ruling on motions in second degree murder case

    1
    By KMAN Staff on May 31, 2016 Local News, Manhattan, Riley County
    Riley County Courthouse-Aguirre-3-16
    Outgoing Riley County District Court Judge David Stutzman has ruled on pretrial motions filed in a second degree murder case involving Joshua Mall of Riley. The Judge agreed to the State’s motion to admit evidence of prior convictions and denied the defendant’s motion to suppress the blood alcohol test in the case.
    As KMAN earlier reported, the state alleged during the motions hearing that Mall was driving with a blood alcohol content of .13 when he collided with another vehicle and then struck a tree on the evening of October fifth 2015 in the 2400 block of Tuttle Creek Boulevard with his daughter Madilyn in the truck.
    Judge Stutzman indicates in the present case, the proposed evidence is based on the Defendant’s prior record of driving offenses, in the context of allegations that intoxication and speeding were also present. An earlier court ruling referenced by Stutzman points to establishing  the defendant had grounds to be aware of the risk his drinking and driving while intoxicated presented to others and he says It is for that purpose the state’s motion should be granted and the proposed evidence admitted. However, Judge Stutzman adds a limiting instruction must be given, directing that the jury may consider this evidence solely for the purpose of deciding whether the state has borne its burden of proof to show Mall acted recklessly under “circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.”
    As for the blood alcohol test, Judge Stutzman describes the decision to order the blood draw was reasonable and that the procedures for extracting the blood were also reasonable.

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    KMAN Staff
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    Related Posts

    Suspect shot after driving through Trooper Gate at Fort Riley

    Riley County Commission to hold quarterly meetings in smaller communities

    Red Cross hosting Manhattan Community Blood Drive Monday and Tuesday

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Listen Live Here
    Listen Live - Mobile

    Categories

    EEO Report

    FCC Public File

    FCC Applications


    Follow @1350kman on Twitter · Manhattan Broadcasting Company is an equal opportunity employer.
    Manhattan Broadcasting does not discriminate in sale of advertising on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity, and will not accept advertising which does so discriminate. © 2022 Manhattan Broadcasting Company.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.